Trusted, Honored, and Awarded
Over $225 Million Recovered For Our Clients

NHTSA wants Americans checking for vehicle recalls often

It is ironic that in an age when cars are being more safely designed than ever, we are also experiencing unprecedented dangers related to vehicle defects. In 2015, approximately 51 million vehicles in the United States were included in nearly 900 recalls. Although last year's recall rate was higher than ever before, the recall trend is becoming disturbingly common.

Another irony in the recall trend has to do with communication. At a time when Americans have up-to-the-minute information available whenever they want to search for it, a surprising number of vehicle owners are not aware that their cars have been included in a safety recall. This could be due to fatigue related to the non-stop string of recalls, however.

In an effort to boost consumer participation in the recall process, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration recently launched a campaign called "Safe Cars Save Lives." The agency is asking all car owners to commit to checking for open recalls at least twice per year.

This has actually become rather easy to do if you have one important piece of information. Websites run by the NHTSA and other agencies allow consumers to enter their vehicle identification number (VIN) into a search tool, which then checks it against VINs provided by auto manufacturers in recall notices. The whole process only takes a minute.

Of course, remembering to do the search is the biggest obstacle. The NHTSA recommends tying it to either end of daylight savings time, which occurs in March and November.

It is more than a little frustrating to think that we have to be responsible for figuring out whether or not our vehicles have been recalled. It is a sad sign that recalls are now the rule and no longer the exception. Still, for the sake of yourself and your family, please make a commitment to check for recalls at least twice a year.

Spontaneous fires continue to injure owners of ‘hoverboards’

There are certain products considered so "cool" that manufacturers cannot wait to put them on the market. Unfortunately, the rush to make money often means that the products are not adequately tested. Companies don’t know how the products will be used – and abused – by consumers.

But people can get hurt even when a product is used as directed. Lack of adequate testing may mean that dangerous design and manufacturing flaws must be discovered by consumers themselves. Good examples of this problem are the products sold as "hoverboards."

These devices don't actually hover. Rather, they are more like a cross between a skateboard and a Segway. But a misleading name is not the worst problem plaguing these products. Instead, there have been numerous reports of hoverboard batteries exploding and causing fires.

In December, a couple in Alabama sued the manufacturer of a hoverboard they had purchased after if allegedly caused a destructive house fire. At that time, the Consumer Product Safety Commission was investigating 16 similar fires in 12 different states – all blamed on malfunctioning hoverboards.

Earlier this week, one of these dangerous and defective products was allegedly responsible for a house fire here in California. News sources say that a Petaluma man heard an explosion that came from where his daughter's hoverboard was plugged in and charging. Thankfully, he was able to put out the fire and no one was injured. But he likely suffered around $10,000 in damage to his home.

Although the cause of these fires has been linked to problems with hoverboard batteries, it is unclear why these defects were not detected before the personal transportation devices went on sale. Releasing a product with serious safety problems isn't just bad for business. It puts consumers in serious danger and exposes the company to serious legal liability.

The poisonous problem with keyless ignition vehicles

There’s no debating the fact that automobiles have become much safer in recent decades. New technologies not only make cars more fuel-efficient; they also help drivers avoid crashes. And when crashes do occur, they tend to be less fatal than they would have been in the past.

But some new automobile technologies – especially those meant to simply increase convenience – come with hidden dangers. A good example is the keyless ignition feature now available on many new cars. These systems allow the car to be turned on with the push of a button as long as the key fob is detected by sensors in the vehicle. While this technology is certainly convenient, most systems do not come equipped with automatic shut-off when the fob is no longer detected. As a result, drivers of these vehicles may be at higher risk for carbon monoxide poisoning.

According to a recent news article, there have been at least 18 confirmed deaths linked to carbon monoxide poisoning in keyless ignition vehicles. Six people were killed in this manner in 2015 alone. In many cases, cars were inadvertently left running in garage attached to victims’ homes. An unknown number of additional victims have survived, but were left with injuries that included brain damage.

The fact that keyless ignition cars can accidentally be left running was perhaps an oversight that automakers could not have predicted. But the fix should be an easy one. In fact, some believe that a software update could solve the problem in both new vehicles and ones which have already been purchased. Two proposed fixes include an auto-shut-off feature if the fob is no longer detected near the vehicle, and an audible alarm if the vehicle senses that the fob is moving away.

But here’s where the story becomes particularly frustrating. Car companies and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration have known about this problem for years. Yet the miniscule amount of progress being made is moving at a snail’s pace. The NHTSA filed a notice of proposed rule making in December 2011. A final rule is not expected until February of 2016, and any rule passed would only apply to new vehicles.

In an attempt to solve the problem more quickly, attorneys have filed a class action lawsuit in California against 10 automakers.

Until or unless changes are made, Americans who own keyless ignition vehicles need to understand the risks they pose. Please ensure that you always turn off your vehicle before leaving it parked.

Truck accident blamed on exploding e-cigarette

At this point, Americans are quite familiar with product liability claims related to automobiles. The Takata air bag scandal is just the latest in a frequent string of recalls for dangerous and defective parts in cars and trucks. Sometimes these defects cause motor vehicle accidents and sometimes they make crashes more likely to be fatal.

It is far rarer to hear about auto accidents caused by defective products that are not actually part of the vehicle. That was apparently the scenario in a recent 18-wheeler accident in the Midwest. According to news sources, the driver of the truck lost control of the vehicle and crashed into a highway guardrail when the e-cigarette he was holding suddenly exploded.

Thankfully, no other vehicles were involved in the crash and the truck driver's crash-related injuries were minor. He did, however, suffer injuries related to the exploding device.

In recent years, e-cigarettes have become an incredibly popular alternative to traditional smoking. This is despite a lack of evidence to support claims that they pose less of a health risk than smoking tobacco products. While this seems to be one of the first reported cases of a crash related to e-cigarettes, there have been other reports of the devices exploding during use. Incidents like this one could lead to personal injury lawsuits, product liability claims and more stringent regulation of these devices.

Although the truck accident occurred in the Midwest, it just as easily could have happened here in California, and with deadlier results. Hopefully, any problems with these apparently dangerous devices will be resolved before such an accident happens again.

Hoverboard fire nearly kills two children trapped in home

Last month, we wrote about an increasing number of spontaneous fires associated with “hoverboards,” which became a fad just before the holiday season. These Segway-like vehicles are made by a number of different manufacturers (but not Segway), and many suffer from one very dangerous defect: Their powerful batteries can overheat and burst into flame.

Some incidents have resulted in burn injuries and significant property damage to homes, including a home here in California. But in January, one hoverboard fire caused a house to burn to the ground, and the two children trapped inside only narrowly escaped with their lives.

The family of six lives in Nashville, Tennessee. The hoverboard was a Christmas present for the family’s 14-year-old son. The teen’s parents did their research, both before and after buying the product. They bought their particular make and model based on good Amazon reviews. When news outlets later reported fire dangers associated with hoverboards, they continued to check online for information. The product still seemed safe, but the parents nonetheless gave the gift with an important caveat: It could only be charged when someone was around to keep an eye on it (fires were most likely to happen while it was plugged in and charging).

On the day of the fire, the hoverboard was not being charged, but it had been stored on the floor between two couches – a toy clean-up habit the teen had learned when he was younger. He and his sister were both upstairs, and didn’t realize the house was on fire until it was already out of control. Thankfully, both were able to escape and suffered relatively minor injuries.

The Consumer Product Safety Commission has received more than 50 reports of hoverboard fires. The commission says that many of these products were not manufactured in compliance with existing safety standards, and it has vowed to recall any and all hoverboards found to be faulty.

If your family owns a hoverboard, please understand just how dangerous these products can be and act accordingly. Even keeping one in your home could present a serious fire hazard. And if you have already been injured by a defective hoverboard, you may want to speak with an experienced Oakland personal injury attorney about your rights and legal options.

NHTSA says software can be considered a driver in autonomous cars

We have previously written about the intriguing possibilities of self-driving cars. This topic is especially interesting to people here in the Bay Area, because Google's autonomous vehicle technology seems to be further along than that of other groups working on this important project.

In December, we wrote about proposed rules issued by the California Department of Motor Vehicles that would require licensed, human drivers to "be present inside the vehicle and be capable of taking control in the event of a technology failure or other emergency." Critics have said that these rules could really slow the progress of innovation. But earlier this month, news from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration seemingly cleared away a major regulatory hurdle.

In a letter that the NHTSA sent to Google, the agency said it "will interpret 'driver' in the context of Google's described motor vehicle design as referring to the (self-driving system), and not to any of the vehicle occupants." In other words, the car's self-driving software could be considered a "driver" for regulatory purposes.

The possibility of self-driving vehicles is exciting from both a convenience standpoint and a safety standpoint. Human error is the cause of or a contributing factor to the vast majority of car accidents. Many tech enthusiasts have predicted that once self-driving vehicles become ubiquitous, the rate of car accidents in the U.S. will decrease dramatically.

On the other hand, we truly don't know how such software will perform. The high number of safety recalls in recent years is a reminder that automakers are not always giving vehicle safety the attention it deserves. If and when accidents do occur, auto companies (and software developers they contract with) could potentially be held liable as both negligent manufacturers and negligent drivers.

The time for self-driving vehicles has not arrived yet, but there is reason to believe it is just around the corner. Hopefully, regulators will not wait to address these important liability questions.

Premises liability involving hazards at traveling events

Whenever an outdoor, temporary structure is built for commercial reasons (like a music festival, for instance), it is crucial for event organizers to take all reasonable precautions. A giant tent may not seem dangerous, but accidents involving wind or structural collapse can be deadly.

Such a scenario seems to occur at least once each year somewhere in the United States – including here in the Bay Area. Last fall, a tent collapse at a traveling circus in New Hampshire was responsible for two deaths and dozens of injuries. An investigation into the accident revealed that the company responsible for setting up the tent failed to erect it properly and also ignored multiple high-wind warnings from the National Weather Service.

The accident was investigated by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration because at least two circus employees were injured. OSHA inspectors determined that the tent had not been erected in accordance with specific diagrams provided by a professional engineer.

The tent also should have been taken down (and performances cancelled) when wind speeds were forecast at more than 60 miles per hour. The company reportedly decided to hold a performance that day despite seven high-wind warnings.

In all, OSHA cited the company for 14 serious violations and proposed fines of nearly $34,000. The company will likely need to pay this amount in addition to any personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits that may have been filed by attendees and their families.

Whether it’s a circus, a music festival, a traveling carnival or any other event, anyone who buys a ticket has a reasonable expectation of safety. When event organizers fail to protect those in attendance, they may be held legally liable.

Why You Should Wear a Helmet When Riding a Bicycle

Riding a bicycle has become the preferred mode of travel for many in Oakland and around the Bay Area. The health benefits are obvious, and depending on where you work, biking can provide a faster commute than driving a car. But there are also some definite drawbacks and risks associated with riding a bike, including getting struck by a motor vehicle.

Following basic safety precautions is crucial for all travelers, but especially so for pedestrians and bicyclists. Perhaps the most important safety measure bicyclists can take is choosing to wear a helmet each and every time they ride.

From time to time, certain studies try to suggest that wearing safety gear can actually make us less safe because of a concept known as “risk homeostasis.” The theory is that wearing helmets and other protective equipment gives us a false sense of security, making us more likely to take risks that we would otherwise avoid.

While risk homeostasis sounds plausible, it remains controversial. More importantly, there don’t seem to be any studies showing definitively that the benefits of wearing a helmet are ever outweighed by the potential for encouraging riskier behavior. But there is an overwhelming body of research to show that bicycle helmets save lives and reduce the severity of injuries when injuries occur. The same is true for motorcycle helmets.

Risk homeostasis could potentially be a problem for some bicyclists. But the message here is simple: You should always wear a helmet and ride defensively. You don’t need to choose one or the other.

Unfortunately, even the most careful bicyclists can suffer serious injuries caused by motorists. If you have been injured due to the negligence of a driver, please seek the help of an experienced Oakland personal injury attorney.

Traffic fatality rates are climbing after years of decline

The safety of road travel in the United States has been improving for decades. Between 2000 and 2014, for instance, annual traffic fatalities declined by 22 percent. That is real, measurable progress.

Unfortunately, preliminary numbers from 2015 suggest that the trend is quickly reversing. In the first nine months of 2015, the rate of traffic fatalities in the U.S. increased 9.3 percent, compared to the same period a year earlier. In human terms, 2015 saw an estimated 26,000 car accident deaths in less than a year.

According to a press release from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, regulators are very concerned by these statistics. In response, the NHTSA is holding a series of regional summits to discuss mitigation strategies and address the human factors underlying many fatal crashes. These include drunk driving, distracted driving, drowsy driving, speeding, failing to wear a seat belt and failure to use child seats. The agency also wants to address ways to increase pedestrian and bicyclist safety.

The first summit was held earlier this month in California's capitol. Commenting on the effort, Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx noted that “For decades, U.S. DOT has been driving safety improvements on our roads, and those efforts have resulted in a steady decline in highway deaths. But the apparent increase in 2015 is a signal that we need to do more. The safety summits that NHTSA is kicking off today in Sacramento will provide us with new approaches to add to the tried-and-true tactics that we know save lives.”

Observers may have noticed that this increasing concern about human driving behavior comes at a time when autonomous vehicles could soon become a reality. It will be interesting to find out whether dangerous driver choices will hasten the adoption of self-driving vehicles.

Why are deadly motor coach bus accidents so common?

In recent years, California roads and highways have been plagued by some devastating and high-profile bus accidents. Many of these accidents involved commercial motor coach companies offering low-fare trips between cities (and states).

There are certainly reputable and reliable carriers. But overall, the motor coach transportation industry is plagued by companies seeking to make a quick buck however and whenever they can. Sadly, the very low fares some companies are able to offer come at the cost of safety.

Since it first began operating in 2006, the company Megabus has made a name for itself across the United States – primarily by offering incredibly low fares for certain trips. In some cases, passengers can ride one way for as little as $1.

But those low prices may come with hidden costs – and not just in the form of extra fees. Megabus has been associated with several injurious and fatal accidents over the past few years. In 2010, four passengers were killed when a double-decker Megabus struck a railroad overpass in New York State.

In 2014, a rollover accident injured 26 passengers in Indiana. A year later, another Megabus crash resulted in 19 injuries.

And recently, a columnist for the New York Times wrote about his own harrowing experience when the Megabus he was riding in caught fire for inexplicable reasons. Passengers were able to escape uninjured, but nearly all luggage stored in the lower compartments was destroyed when the whole bus became engulfed in flames.

To be sure, Megabus is not the only motor coach company with a bad safety record. In fact, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration has found it very difficult to regulate this industry overall. Fly-by-night companies may get shut down, only to reopen under different names.

If you ever rely on bus transportation between cities or states, please understand the risks that often hide behind the promise of low fares. Before you buy a ticket from any carrier, take the time to do some online research. A company's safety record should tell you all you need to know.

If You Are Wronged, We Will Make It Right. Schedule A Free Confidential Consultation At Winer, Burritt & Scott, LLP, we empower our clients. We take on the largest law firms, toughest insurance defense lawyers and largest companies with confidence. * Bold text labels are required for submission | We practice in California only.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.